Problems we address
- Recurring fixes lack root-cause evidence
- Backup and update ownership are unclear
- A lab score is detached from user impact
- Small requests become an unbounded backlog
We measure defects, bottlenecks and update risks before deciding whether to repair, optimise or rebuild.
Who it is for
Teams with an existing site or application that needs reliability, speed, updates or a controlled improvement backlog.
Target business outcome
A prioritised plan with intervention boundaries, test and release methods, and visible third-party dependencies.
Scope options
Use cases
Separates server, media, JavaScript, fonts and third-party impact.
Uses staging, backup, critical-flow tests and rollback.
Prioritises defects, improvements and features against capacity.
Working approach
Updates, defects, performance and small development are written separately in the selected scope.
No. Backup and restoration ownership depends on hosting and data architecture.
Technology, access, licensing and technical debt are reviewed first.
Comparable test conditions, field metrics and critical journeys are measured before and after.
Project enquiry
A short brief is enough. We clarify the suitable solution, integrations and next step during the discussion.